Mathematics Implementation Study: Final Report
June 2000


Deborah J. Holtzman, Tania J. Madfes, Steven A. Schneider, Vi-Nhuan Le, Daniel McCaffrey, Marika Suttorp, Laura Hamilton, Stephen Klein, James R. Smith, Gerald C. Hayward, & Naomi Calvo


"Often I'm torn between 'mixed messages'… It's often
hard to know what and how to teach math."

Fourth-Grade Teacher

"I feel very strongly that there needs to be a balance between skills and manipulatives.
The theory behind figuring out how to do the problems, as well as memorizing
algorithms-I think that there needs to be a balance...between the two."

Eighth-Grade Mathematics Teacher


In the spring of 1998, the California Department of Education (CDE) awarded a contract to WestEd, in collaboration with the RAND Corporation and Management Analysis and Planning, Inc. (MAP), to study mathematics instruction in California. The study was designed to examine the instructional practices used in teaching mathematics in grades 4 and 8, the relationship between instructional practices and student achievement, and the influence of state and local policies on instruction. In addition to instructional practices, primary focuses of the study included curriculum materials, standards, assessment, professional development, and structural and student influences on instruction. The findings of the study and implications for policy are reported in this document. Portions of the document, as described below, can be downloaded in PDF format.

Front Matter (6 pp.): Title page, copyright page, table of contents, list of figures

Executive Summary (3 pp.): Summarizes the study's findings and recommendations.

Chapter 1, "Introduction" (2 pp.): Presents the study's major research questions and background, and outlines the remaining chapters.

Chapter 2, "Methodology" (10 pp.): Describes the study's research methodology and data collection instruments.

Chapter 3, "Instructional Practices and Effectiveness" (20 pp.): Presents and discusses quantitative and qualitative study findings on correlations between instructional practices and student achievement.

Chapter 4, "Curriculum Materials" (20 pp.): Presents study findings on the extent to which district-adopted curriculum materials are used by teachers and discusses teachers' concerns about instructional materials.

Chapter 5, "Content Standards" (16 pp.): Presents and discusses study findings on teachers' reactions to and familiarity with various standards documents, the impact of standards on instruction, and the alignment of standards with curriculum.

Chapter 6, "Assessment" (12 pp.): Presents and discusses study findings on the impact of the Stanford Achievement Test, Ninth Edition, Form T (SAT-9) and on perceived problems with this and other assessments.

Chapter 7, "Professional Development" (18 pp.): Presents and discusses study findings on the amount of professional development teachers reported having received since January 1998, the ways in which teachers report that professional development enhances their instruction, and the challenges of providing effective professional development on a wide-scale basis.

Chapter 8, "Structural and Student Influences on Instruction" (14 pp.): Presents and discusses study findings on the influences on instruction that are structural, such as those relating to time and class size, and that are student-related, such as those concerning student preparation, skill level, behavior, and motivation.

Chapter 9, "Recommendations and Conclusions" (8 pp.): Summarizes the study's primary findings in relation to the research questions, discusses policy implications, and presents recommendations based on the findings and implications.



References (4 pp.)

Appendix A: RAND Report

Appendix B: Instruments and Protocols:

Survey of Mathematics Instructional Practices in California: 4th Grade Teacher Questionnaire (13 pp.)

Survey of Mathematics Instructional Practices in California: 8th Grade Teacher Questionnaire (13 pp.)

Classroom Observation Protocol: Outline for Qualitative Write-Up (2 pp.)

Interview Protocol: Teachers (3 pp.)

Interview Protocol: Principals (2 pp.)

Interview Protocol: District Curriculum Coordinator/ Math Specialist (3 pp.)

Interview Protocol: Policy Implications (2 pp.)

Survey of Mathematics Instructional Practices in California: 10th Grade Teacher Questionnaire (Pilot Test Version) (13 pp.)

Appendix C: "Profiles of Selected Top-Quartile Classes" (12 pp.)

Appendix D: "Findings from the Grade 10 Exploratory Study" (3 pp.)

Appendix E: "Additional Figures" (5 pp.)