California Dept of Education      A-Z Index   |   Search   |   Help
  Accountability | Curriculum | Professional Development | Students | Family-Community | Programs | Resources

Resources for Local Accountability
Local Accountability

RLA > Local Accountability

RLA Home

Designing a System

Elements of a System

District Practices
   Table
   Index

Local Systems

Fed & State Systems

Resources


Download the full description in PDF (54kb)


A state accountability system is necessary but likely not sufficient to drive continual improvement in schools within a district. The district and each school must have a local system of accountability that builds internal responsibility and empowerment to continually explore the best practices that will help all students reach high standards. The local accountability system incorporates several purposes and types of decisions that define individual and collective responsibilities, and nurture individual and team learning for both adults and children.


Standards-Based Accountability

A standards-based accountability system defines roles of responsibility and processes for:
  • communicating results to the public;
  • acknowledging and celebrating areas of effectiveness; and
  • making decisions about areas for improvement.
Data are collected and analyzed about student performance and how district and school practices should be enhanced to maximize student academic achievement of content standards. The combined impact of district and school practices is linked to student results to decide how to improve practice to improve student learning.

The local accountability system includes the state assessment results with local standards-based assessment results to provide rich information for data-based decisions. Local assessments provide quick and frequent data for decisions within and across years. State assessments provide annual data for judging school and district effectiveness, and bolster confidence in local results when there is agreement between local and state results.

Educators in some schools and districts remark that they do not have time to reflect on results because they are too busy implementing. The question is whether they are making progress toward a measurable, clear goal of high-quality education for all students or just maintaining the status quo. Educators in districts and schools making sustained, meaningful improvement ensure time and build capacity as an organization continually learning from results.

In a standards-based accountability system, the district judges and continually improves its actions to guide and support schools in areas such as:
  • establishing achievable yet challenging long-range goals with measurable (benchmark) indicators;

  • allocating resources and setting policies that match highly skilled teachers to schools with the greatest needs;

  • aligning local curriculum, instruction, and assessments to state standards;

  • aligning the local accountability system to the state accountability system and concentrating on areas of local concern and value;

  • capitalizing on its capability to use performance assessments to measure highest-priority standards and flexibility in accommodating students with diverse needs and interests;

  • conducting districtwide professional development on districtwide issues and strongly supporting school-initiated professional development on school needs without switching the focus until goals are reached;

  • nurturing a leadership style focused on changing the system rather than blaming individuals; and

  • managing data collection, storage, analysis of progress toward standards, and communicating results that allows data-based decision-making at critical times.

This page is maintained by the CIL Branch Web Team.
Updated November 20, 2001
Copyright © California Department of Education.
You are at: http://www.cde.ca.gov
Contact CDE | Help | CDE Home
Valid HTML 4.0!